Labor Can Win in Difficult Times - 13th May 2013
Firm steps
towards an unlikely Labor win
·
THEO
THEOPHANOUS
·
HERALD
SUN
·
MAY
13, 2013
A boatload of Sri Lankan asylum
seekers arriving in Geraldton. Picture: Graeme Gibbons
THE Gillard Labor
Government faces three monumental negatives in the lead-up to the election: a
huge Budget black hole, a credibility problem and its failure to stop the boats
even after committing $2.5 billion to do so.
Call me an optimist, but I believe Labor can still win the next
election, but it must reclaim its credentials as an economic and financial
manager and innovator.
Labor's heritage is replete with examples of tough reforms in
financial deregulation, compulsory superannuation, the Medicare levy and
strategic investments in nation building - most recently the NBN.
Beyond a NDIS levy it must collect real money from the big miners,
introduce a super tax on the big banks, close down tax loopholes that benefit
foreign investors and introduce GST on all internet purchases to help local
industry. Simultaneously it must deliver on Gonski, restore tertiary and
research funding levels and announce nation building infrastructure projects.
It must deliver on those and other measures to balance the Budget
over time, deliver on social policy and stimulate economic growth.
Labor should dump the carbon tax and immediately establish an
Emissions Trading Scheme.
The carbon tax has allowed Tony Abbott to unfairly but effectively
cast Julia Gillard as a liar. It is no longer a debate about climate change,
but about the PM's credibility.
Labor needs a circuit breaker. Dumping the carbon tax for an
emissions trading scheme would wrong-foot Abbott. He would have to face the
substantive issue as many in his team, including Malcolm Turnbull, support an
ETS.
Labor should also dump Australia's obligation to process boat
people under the UN Refugee Convention as part of a strategy to stop the boats.
That may mean that we have to remove Australia as a signatory - at least in the
short term - from the convention altogether.
But even that is more honest and humane than detaining families
offshore for years in excised parts of Australia or on Manus or Nauru.
Let's be clear, the UN Refugee Convention is outdated, introduced
in 1951 to deal with those escaping Communism in Europe. It is in need of
review in a world where there are 19 million asylum seekers who may be
political refugees but who, in many cases, are seeking a better life.
In removing Australia from the convention, we should make clear
that we will still accept big numbers of refugees, but we will send boat people
back immediately without processing them.
That will send a powerful message to the people smugglers that if
they manage to get people to Australia they will not be processed, they will be
sent back. If they come from a holding country like Indonesia - as most do -
they may be given a choice to be sent back to rejoin other asylum seekers
waiting to be processed in Indonesia or to their country of origin. Once two or
three boatloads of people are sent back as soon as they arrive, the people
smuggler trade would be killed.
Of course, sending boat people back to Indonesia will require
Indonesian support. That will not be difficult if we offer assistance to
Indonesia in patrol boats or village programs or other measures to stop the
trade while increasing our intake of refugees by 15,000, with a big proportion
of those to come from Indonesia.
The approach is dramatic, but less costly and more humane and it
will stop the boats. Abbott's way will not stop the boats because people will
still risk their lives even if they are going to be treated more harshly than
they are now. Turning back the boats in international waters using our Navy is
costly and won't work. Desperate people will simply sink their boats and force
us to pick them up.
Quite simply, Labor's way should be to save lives by making it
clear that if you come by boat, you will not be processed, you will be sent
back, and by offering a better life to an extra 15,000 refugees.
These three actions amount to Federal Labor drawing on its rich
heritage of achievement in providing security, prosperity and a fair go. But
even if it does that, Labor still faces the fight of its life.
Theo Theophanous is a former Victorian
government minister
Comments